Within False Dilemma
What Did 'With US' Leave Out?
The post-9/11 phrase shows how political rhetoric can draw a sharp boundary while obscuring disagreement over methods.
On this page
- The diplomatic boundary
- Support versus method disagreement
- Why context matters in judging the frame
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
In discussions of logical fallacies, President George W. Bush’s post-9/11 declaration that “Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists” is often cited as a prominent example of an either-or frame that narrowed a more complex set of political choices. The statement appeared in Bush’s address to a joint session of Congress on 20 September 2001, when the United States was mobilising a global response to the attacks of 11 September. In context, Bush was demanding cooperation against terrorist groups and the governments that sheltered them. Yet critics argued that the language also compressed a wide range of possible positions into only two camps. [George W. Bush Presidential Library]georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.govGeorge WBush Presidential LibraryPresident Declares "Freedom at War with Fear"President Bush addressed a joint session of Congress and the Americ…
The significance of the phrase is not that opposition to terrorism was controversial. Rather, the debate concerns what happened to the many positions that existed between wholehearted endorsement of every aspect of U.S. policy and support for terrorism itself. That tension makes the statement a useful case study within the broader topic of false dilemmas and missing middle options.
What Did “With Us” Leave Out?
Bush’s formulation presented a stark choice: support the United States in its campaign against terrorism or stand on the side of terrorists. In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, the phrase served a powerful rhetorical purpose. It communicated urgency, moral clarity, and a demand for international cooperation at a moment of widespread fear and uncertainty. George W. Bush Presidential Library [Council on Foreign Relations]cfr.orghow 911 reshaped foreign policyeither you are with us or you are with the terrorists.” The U.S. government uses the term “global war on terror” to describe its far…R…
From the perspective of argument analysis, however, the question is whether the available options were actually exhausted by those two categories. Many governments, organisations, and citizens could simultaneously condemn terrorism while disagreeing about military tactics, legal authorities, intelligence practices, detention policies, or the scope of future military action. Those positions did not fit neatly into either side of the binary. [Philosophy Now]philosophynow.orgPhilosophy NowThe Bush Disjunction | Issue 52… September 11 terrorist attacks, U.S. President George W. Bush gave a speech to… eithe…
A false dilemma occurs when an argument treats two possibilities as if they are the only relevant choices despite the existence of additional alternatives. Critics of the phrase therefore argued that it risked equating disagreement over methods with sympathy for the enemy, even when the disagreement concerned how best to fight terrorism rather than whether terrorism should be opposed. [Philosophy Now]philosophynow.orgPhilosophy NowThe Bush Disjunction | Issue 52… September 11 terrorist attacks, U.S. President George W. Bush gave a speech to… eithe…
The Diplomatic Boundary
The original speech was directed not only at Americans but also at foreign governments. Bush followed the famous line by warning that nations continuing to harbour or support terrorists would be regarded as hostile regimes. The immediate target was the Taliban government in Afghanistan, which was sheltering al-Qaeda leadership. George W. Bush Presidential Library [American Archive]americanarchive.orgEither you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. [applause] From this day forward, any nation…Read more…
In that narrow diplomatic sense, the statement can be interpreted as a demand that states stop providing safe haven to terrorist organisations. Under this reading, the intended distinction was between governments cooperating against al-Qaeda and governments assisting or protecting it. George W. Bush Presidential Library [CIAO]ciaotest.cc.columbia.eduCIAOThe Bush Doctrine and U.SInterventionby CJ Dolan · 2004 · Cited by 15 — Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation… The difficulty arises because political slogans often travel beyond their original audience and purpose. Once repeated in media coverage andpublic debate, the phrase could be understood more broadly than the specific policy demand embedded in the speech. A statement aimed at governments that actively supported terrorist groups could also be heard as a warning directed at anyone questioning aspects of the emerging “war on terror”. [Council on Foreign Relations]cfr.orghow 911 reshaped foreign policyeither you are with us or you are with the terrorists.” The U.S. government uses the term “global war on terror” to describe its far…R…
Support for the Goal Versus Disagreement About the Method
The most important missing middle option involved the distinction between ends and means.
Many people agreed on the end: preventing further terrorist attacks and pursuing those responsible for 9/11. Agreement on that objective did not automatically imply agreement on every proposed method. Reasonable disagreements existed over questions such as:
- Whether military action should be limited or expansive.
- How much authority should be delegated to the executive branch.
- The balance between security measures and civil liberties.
- The role of international institutions and alliances.
- The conditions under which force should be used against additional states.
These positions occupied a substantial middle ground between support for terrorism and unconditional support for all U.S. policies. Yet the rhetorical force of the binary could make such distinctions harder to communicate in public debate. [Marshall Center]marshallcenter.orgMarshall Center The EU and U.SStrategies against Terrorism and Proliferation of…This paper is intended to give a comparative analysis of the strategies of US and EU…
The experience of Representative Barbara Lee is often discussed in this context. Lee was the sole member of Congress to vote against the 2001 Authorisation for Use of Military Force. She repeatedly stressed that she opposed terrorism but feared granting overly broad authority for future military action. Her position illustrates how opposition to a particular policy could coexist with support for the broader goal of responding to the attacks. [Vanity Fair]vanityfair.comVanity Fair"We Can Never Allow This to Happen Again": RepBarbara Lee on Afghanistan's Spectacular Fall and the Futility of "Forever Wars"August 18, 2021 — Rep. Barbara Lee reflects on her vote a…
Why Context Matters in Judging the Frame
Whether the phrase should be classified as a false dilemma depends partly on how narrowly or broadly it is interpreted.
If the statement is read as a specific warning to governments that sheltered terrorist organisations, the choice may appear less fallacious. A state either would cooperate in denying sanctuary to al-Qaeda or would continue enabling it. In that limited context, Bush was drawing a strategic boundary rather than mapping every possible political position. George W. Bush Presidential Library [American Archive]americanarchive.orgEither you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. [applause] From this day forward, any nation…Read more…
If, however, the phrase is interpreted as a broader political frame for public debate, the criticism becomes stronger. Publics, allies, legislators, and commentators were not limited to only two meaningful positions. They could oppose terrorism while disagreeing about strategy, law, proportionality, or long-term objectives. Under that interpretation, the statement obscured important intermediate positions and encouraged a simplified view of a complex policy landscape. [Philosophy Now]philosophynow.orgPhilosophy NowThe Bush Disjunction | Issue 52… September 11 terrorist attacks, U.S. President George W. Bush gave a speech to… eithe… [SSRN]papers.ssrn.comMany people did accept his subsequent arguments,SSRN[PDF] Good Versus Evil: Argument to Begin Global War on TerrorismWe also argue that once President Bush set the Good versus Evil fram…
This explains why the phrase remains a recurring example in discussions of false dilemmas. The issue is not whether terrorism should be condemned. The issue is whether political rhetoric can collapse distinctions that matter, turning debates about methods, limits, and alternatives into apparent tests of loyalty.
Why the Phrase Endures as a False-Dilemma Example
More than two decades later, the expression continues to be cited because it captures a common feature of political persuasion: the ability to mobilise support by narrowing the perceived choice set. The phrase was memorable precisely because it reduced uncertainty and offered moral clarity during a crisis. [Council on Foreign Relations]cfr.orghow 911 reshaped foreign policyeither you are with us or you are with the terrorists.” The U.S. government uses the term “global war on terror” to describe its far…R…
At the same time, its lasting controversy shows why analysts of logical fallacies pay attention to missing middle options. Political decisions often involve degrees of support, conditional cooperation, procedural objections, and disagreements about implementation. When those possibilities disappear from view, audiences may begin evaluating only the two options presented rather than asking whether other legitimate positions exist.
Bush’s “with us or with the terrorists” formulation therefore remains a useful historical example of how either-or rhetoric can strengthen a political message while also narrowing the space for qualified agreement and nuanced disagreement. [Philosophy Now]philosophynow.orgPhilosophy NowThe Bush Disjunction | Issue 52… September 11 terrorist attacks, U.S. President George W. Bush gave a speech to… eithe… [Wikipedia]WikipediaSeptember 2001 George W. Bush speech to a joint session of CongressBush speech to a joint session…September 20, 2001 (2001-09-20). Time, 8:00 p.m. EST. Duration, 35 minutes… terrorists, and aids and…
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.
Endnotes
-
Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Title: George W
Link: https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010920-8.htmlSource snippet
Bush Presidential LibraryPresident Declares "Freedom at War with Fear"President Bush addressed a joint session of Congress and the Americ...
-
Source: papers.ssrn.com
Title: Many people did accept his subsequent arguments,
Link: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID2775610_code1792737.pdf?abstractid=2775610&mirid=1Source snippet
SSRN[PDF] Good Versus Evil: Argument to Begin Global War on TerrorismWe also argue that once President Bush set the Good versus Evil fram...
-
Source: ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu
Title: CIAOThe Bush Doctrine and U.S
Link: https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/ad/ad_v9_2/doc01.htmlSource snippet
Interventionby CJ Dolan · 2004 · Cited by 15 — Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation...
-
Source: 2009-2017.state.gov
Link: https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2001/html/10249.htmSource snippet
Department of StateL - Overview of State-Sponsored TerrorismEither you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." President George W...
-
Source: ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu
Title: fa sepoct03a
Link: https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/fa/fa_sepoct03a.htmlSource snippet
There are only two powers now in the world. One is America, which is tyrannical and oppressive. The...Read more...
-
Source: Wikipedia
Title: September 2001 George W. Bush speech to a joint session of Congress
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_2001_George_W._Bush_speech_to_a_joint_session_of_CongressSource snippet
Bush speech to a joint session...September 20, 2001 (2001-09-20). Time, 8:00 p.m. EST. Duration, 35 minutes... terrorists, and aids and...
Published: September 2001
-
Source: Wikipedia
Title: You are either with us, or against us
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_are_either_with_us%2C_or_against_usSource snippet
You are either with us, or against usA contemporary example is the statement of former US President George W.... Either you are with...
-
Source: americanarchive.org
Link: https://americanarchive.org/primary_source_sets/war-on-terror/5-507-6m3319sr3rSource snippet
Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. [applause] From this day forward, any nation...Read more...
-
Source: cfr.org
Title: how 911 reshaped foreign policy
Link: https://www.cfr.org/timelines/how-911-reshaped-foreign-policySource snippet
either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.” The U.S. government uses the term “global war on terror” to describe its far...R...
-
Source: philosophynow.org
Link: https://philosophynow.org/issues/52/The_Bush_DisjunctionSource snippet
Philosophy NowThe Bush Disjunction | Issue 52... September 11 terrorist attacks, U.S. President George W. Bush gave a speech to... eithe...
-
Source: marshallcenter.org
Title: Marshall Center The EU and U.S
Link: https://www.marshallcenter.org/en/publications/occasional-papers/eu-and-us-strategies-against-terrorism-and-proliferation-wmd-comparative-study-0Source snippet
Strategies against Terrorism and Proliferation of...This paper is intended to give a comparative analysis of the strategies of US and EU...
-
Source: vanityfair.com
Title: Vanity Fair”We Can Never Allow This to Happen Again”: Rep
Link: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/08/barbara-lee-afghanistan-withdrawal-joe-bidenSource snippet
Barbara Lee on Afghanistan's Spectacular Fall and the Futility of "Forever Wars"August 18, 2021 — Rep. Barbara Lee reflects on her vote a...
Published: August 18, 2021
-
Source: mulroneyinstitute.ca
Title: George W
Link: https://www.mulroneyinstitute.ca/node/5006Source snippet
Bush's Address After 9/11Nine days following the September 11th 2001 attacks on the United States, George W. Bush addressed both houses o...
-
Source: researchgate.net
Title: Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists
Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/33417009_Either_you_are_with_us_or_you_are_with_the_terrorists_A_discourse_analysis_of_President_George_W_Bush%27s_declared_war_on_terrorismSource snippet
Citation | Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. A discourse analysis of President George W. Bush's decla...
Additional References
-
Source: georgewbushlibrary.gov
Link: https://www.georgewbushlibrary.gov/research/topic-guides/global-war-terrorSource snippet
Global War on TerrorThe Global War on Terror is an international, American-led military campaign launched following the September 11, 200...
-
Source: bu.edu
Link: https://www.bu.edu/historic/hs/nov01.htmlSource snippet
Boston UniversityThe Historical Society, Boston UniversityHis weapon is not traditional war, but terror. Ideally, terrorists represent a...
-
Source: teenvogue.com
Link: https://www.teenvogue.com/story/what-is-the-aumf-iraqSource snippet
presidents to wage war globally. The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to declare war, but since World War II, presidents have...
-
Source: facebook.com
Title: gravitas in 2001 george w bush had declared either you are with us or you are wi
Link: https://www.facebook.com/WIONews/posts/gravitas-in-2001-george-w-bush-had-declared-either-you-are-with-us-or-you-are-wi/1840152766195350/Source snippet
#Gravitas | In 2001, George W Bush had declared: "...Gravitas | In 2001, George W Bush had declared: "Either you are with us or you are...
-
Source: securitypolicylaw.syr.edu
Link: https://securitypolicylaw.syr.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Barnett_American-Exceptionalism_and_the_Construction_of_the_War_on-Terror-mwedit111716.pdfSource snippet
11, 2001, galvanized the articulation of a comprehensive counterterrorism policy framework in the Middle East; however...
-
Source: presidency.ucsb.edu
Title: address before joint session the congress the state the union 24
Link: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-before-joint-session-the-congress-the-state-the-union-24Source snippet
Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the...20 Jan 2004 — As part of the offensive against terror, we are also confronting the regim...
-
Source: thesis.eur.nl
Link: https://thesis.eur.nl/pub/45939/Gestel_366765.pdfSource snippet
A content analysis of the news coverage of George W. Bush's speeches on the War on...Read more...
-
Source: georgewbushlibrary.gov
Title: 9 11 the steel of american resolve
Link: https://www.georgewbushlibrary.gov/explore/exhibits/9-11-the-steel-of-american-resolveSource snippet
George W. Bush Library9/11: The Steel of American ResolveThe 9/11 terrorist attacks killed 2977 people and changed the world as we knew i...
-
Source: facebook.com
Title: Why is he talking about Iran, Iraq and North Korea?
Link: https://www.facebook.com/AmericanExperiencePBS/posts/states-like-these-and-their-terrorist-allies-constitute-an-axis-of-evil-arming-t/1292641179578160/Source snippet
"States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil...January 29, 2026 — I watched the speech, and I remember thi...
Published: January 29, 2026
-
Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Link: https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/nsc/nssall.htmlSource snippet
National Security Strategy of the United States of AmericaToday, the United States enjoys a position of unparalleled military strength an...
Topic Tree