Within Slippery Slope
Does One Exception Really Rewrite the Rule?
Precedent matters, but one decision does not automatically force every later case to be treated the same way.
On this page
- What precedent claims get right
- Relevant similarity versus vague similarity
- Examples where lines can still be drawn
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Arguments about precedent often appear inside slippery slope reasoning. The claim is simple: once an institution makes one exception, it will be unable to refuse similar requests later. Therefore, the first decision supposedly commits it to a long chain of increasingly broader decisions. This concern is not entirely misplaced. Courts, regulators, universities, and governments do value consistency, and precedents can influence future choices. However, a common mistake is to assume that consistency requires treating all superficially similar cases alike. In practice, precedent systems work by identifying relevant similarities and relevant differences, not by mechanically repeating every earlier decision. The slippery slope arises when an argument exaggerates how strongly one precedent controls future cases and understates the institution’s ability to draw new lines. [Hallellis]hallellis.co.ukSource details in endnotes. [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]plato.stanford.edulegal reas precAnalogy involves an earlier decision being followed in a…Read more…
Does One Exception Really Rewrite the Rule?
A precedent argument becomes stronger when it shows that future decision-makers will have genuine difficulty distinguishing later cases from the first one. It becomes weaker when it merely assumes that any exception destroys the possibility of future limits.
The core mechanism is straightforward. A speaker argues:
- Decision A is being proposed.
- Future cases will resemble A.
- Consistency requires treating those cases the same way.
- Therefore, increasingly broader outcomes will follow.
The crucial step is the third one. Consistency does not mean treating all cases alike. It means treating materially similar cases alike. Legal and administrative systems routinely ask whether differences between cases matter to the rule being applied. If they do, different outcomes can still be justified without abandoning consistency. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [The Open University]open.eduThe Open UniversityWeek 3: 2.3.2 Distinguishing | OpenLearnThe main device for avoiding binding precedent is that of distinguishing the p…
This is why many scholars treat precedent-based slippery slope arguments as neither automatically valid nor automatically fallacious. The strength of the argument depends on whether meaningful distinctions are likely to survive after the first decision. [PhilPapers]philpapers.orgPhil Papers Precedent Slippery SlopesKatharina Stevensby K Stevens · 2023 · Cited by 2 — This chapter discusses slippery slope arguments that are used in the context of commo… [Pure UVA]pure.uva.nlPure UVAThe slippery slope argumentby GA den Hartogh · Cited by 66 — If the appeal to a pernicious precedent is a valid form of argument…
What Precedent Claims Get Right
Precedent arguments are not baseless fears. Institutions often care deeply about predictability, fairness, and equal treatment. If one person receives a benefit, exemption, or right, others may reasonably ask why they should be treated differently. A precedent can create pressure to justify future distinctions rather than simply asserting them. [Hallellis]hallellis.co.ukSource details in endnotes. [CEB]ceb.comHow to Leverage Past Decisions in Current CasesCEBPrecedent serves key functions in the legal system: it ensures stability and predictability, allowing individuals and businesses to an…
This pressure matters because decision-makers generally want to avoid arbitrary treatment. An exception can therefore change the argumentative landscape. Future claimants may point to the earlier decision and argue that denying them the same treatment would be unfair.
For example:
- A university grants deadline extensions for serious medical emergencies.
- Later students seek extensions for other hardships.
- Administrators must explain why some situations qualify and others do not.
The original decision has created a reference point. Future cases cannot simply ignore it.
This insight explains why precedent-based slippery slope arguments can sometimes identify real institutional pressures. A first step may make later expansions easier to argue for, even if it does not make them inevitable. [UCLA School of Law]www2.law.ucla.eduSchool of Law The Mechanisms of the Slippery SlopeUCLA School of LawThe Mechanisms of the Slippery SlopeNovember 26, 2012 — by E Volokh — recognizes a new exception to free speech protect… [PhilPapers]philpapers.orgPhil Papers Precedent Slippery SlopesKatharina Stevensby K Stevens · 2023 · Cited by 2 — This chapter discusses slippery slope arguments that are used in the context of commo…
Relevant Similarity Versus Vague Similarity
The most common exaggeration occurs when an argument treats vague resemblance as if it were legally or institutionally decisive.
Almost any two cases can be described as similar in some respect. Equally, almost any two cases can be distinguished in some respect. The important question is whether the similarity or difference is relevant to the principle at issue. Legal theorists have long noted that both comparison and distinction are available in nearly every precedent dispute. [UNC Law Scholarship Repository]scholarship.law.unc.eduUNC Law Scholarship RepositoryThe Nature of Precedentby E Maltz · 1988 · Cited by 327 — As already noted, all cases will be similar to th…
Consider these two claims:
- “If we allow service animals, we must allow all pets.”
- “If we allow service animals, we may need a rule explaining why trained assistance animals differ from ordinary pets.”
The first argument assumes that any animal-related exception eliminates future boundaries. The second asks whether a principled distinction exists.
A precedent-based slippery slope often gains persuasive force by quietly shifting from relevant similarity to superficial similarity. Once that shift occurs, every later case appears to belong inside the same category, even when decision-makers could reasonably define narrower criteria.
This is closely related to what legal systems call distinguishing a case. Rather than rejecting precedent entirely, decision-makers explain why the earlier ruling involved different material facts. Distinguishing is not an escape from consistency; it is one of the main ways consistency is maintained. [The Open University]open.eduThe Open UniversityWeek 3: 2.3.2 Distinguishing | OpenLearnThe main device for avoiding binding precedent is that of distinguishing the p…
Why Institutions Are Often Better at Drawing Lines Than Critics Assume
Many slippery slope arguments depend on a pessimistic view of institutional decision-making. They assume that once a line moves, no further line can be drawn.
Yet real governance systems possess several tools for limiting precedents:
- Narrow rulings: Decisions can be framed around specific facts rather than broad principles.
- Eligibility criteria: Policymakers can define conditions that must be met before an exception applies.
- Review mechanisms: Later cases can be evaluated individually rather than automatically approved.
- Distinguishing practices: Courts and agencies can identify legally significant differences between situations.
- Rule revision: Legislatures and regulators can clarify boundaries if ambiguity emerges. [The Open University]open.eduThe Open UniversityWeek 3: 2.3.2 Distinguishing | OpenLearnThe main device for avoiding binding precedent is that of distinguishing the p… [hallellis]hallellis.co.ukSource details in endnotes. Because these mechanisms exist, the mere existence of one precedent does not prove that every future claim will succeed.
This does not mean line-drawing is always easy. Some categories genuinely become difficult to defend once an exception is recognised. But a slippery slope argument must show why the distinction will fail, not merely assume that it will.
Examples Where Lines Can Still Be Drawn
Emergency exceptions and ordinary convenience
Suppose an employer allows remote work during a severe transport disruption.
A slippery slope argument might claim that every employee will soon demand permanent remote work and that office attendance rules will collapse. Yet the organisation can distinguish between temporary emergencies and ordinary preferences. The existence of one exception does not eliminate the distinction.
Medical exemptions and general exemptions
A school might exempt students from a requirement because of documented medical conditions.
Critics could argue that any exemption forces acceptance of every personal preference. However, institutions routinely separate medical necessity from convenience or preference through evidence requirements and eligibility standards.
Freedom of expression limits
Legal scholars discussing precedent frequently note that recognising one exception does not automatically require recognising all future exceptions. A court may accept a narrowly defined category while rejecting others based on different constitutional concerns. The key question is whether future cases are materially similar, not merely whether they share a label. [UCLA School of Law]www2.law.ucla.eduSchool of Law The Mechanisms of the Slippery SlopeUCLA School of LawThe Mechanisms of the Slippery SlopeNovember 26, 2012 — by E Volokh — recognizes a new exception to free speech protect…
In each example, the precedent creates pressure for justification, but not an obligation to erase all boundaries.
When the Concern Becomes Stronger
Some precedent arguments are more persuasive than others.
The concern gains force when:
- The proposed distinction is vague or unstable.
- Decision-makers have previously expanded similar categories.
- Future cases differ only marginally from the initial one.
- No clear principle explains where the boundary should stop.
In such situations, the institution may genuinely struggle to defend a limiting rule. Scholars discussing slippery slopes often emphasise that the important issue is the mechanism connecting the first decision to later ones. A warning becomes stronger when it explains why distinctions will erode over time rather than merely predicting that they will. [UCLA Law Review]uclalawreview.orgAn initial, seemingly acceptable argument and decision;. 2. A "danger case"-a later argument and…Read more… [Pure UVA]pure.uva.nlPure UVAThe slippery slope argumentby GA den Hartogh · Cited by 66 — If the appeal to a pernicious precedent is a valid form of argument…
The Key Question Behind Precedent-Based Slippery Slopes
The most useful response to a precedent-based slippery slope argument is not, “That could never happen,” nor, “That outcome is inevitable.”
Instead, the central question is: what principle allows the first case while excluding the later ones?
If a convincing principle exists, then consistency may support the initial exception without requiring the feared expansion. If no principled distinction can be articulated, the slippery slope concern becomes more credible.
The fallacy arises when an argument skips this analysis and assumes that one exception automatically rewrites the rule. Precedent matters because institutions value consistency, but consistency is not the same thing as treating every vaguely similar case identically. The ability to identify relevant differences is precisely what allows precedents to guide future decisions without making every future outcome unavoidable. [PhilPapers]philpapers.orgPhil Papers Precedent Slippery SlopesKatharina Stevensby K Stevens · 2023 · Cited by 2 — This chapter discusses slippery slope arguments that are used in the context of commo… [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]plato.stanford.edulegal reas precAnalogy involves an earlier decision being followed in a…Read more…[The Open University]open.eduThe Open UniversityWeek 3: 2.3.2 Distinguishing | OpenLearnThe main device for avoiding binding precedent is that of distinguishing the p…
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.
Endnotes
-
Source: plato.stanford.edu
Title: legal reas prec
Link: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-reas-prec/Source snippet
Analogy involves an earlier decision being followed in a...Read more...
-
Source: open.edu
Link: https://www.open.edu/openlearn/ocw/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=68344§ion=2.3.2Source snippet
The Open UniversityWeek 3: 2.3.2 Distinguishing | OpenLearnThe main device for avoiding binding precedent is that of distinguishing the p...
-
Source: scholarship.law.unc.edu
Link: [https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3133&contextSource snippet
UNC Law Scholarship RepositoryThe Nature of Precedentby E Maltz · 1988 · Cited by 327 — As already noted, all cases will be similar to th...
-
Source: philpapers.org
Title: Phil Papers Precedent Slippery Slopes
Link: https://philpapers.org/rec/STEPSS-3Source snippet
Katharina Stevensby K Stevens · 2023 · Cited by 2 — This chapter discusses slippery slope arguments that are used in the context of commo...
-
Source: pure.uva.nl
Link: https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/1964247/28071_60._Slippery_Slope.pdfSource snippet
Pure UVAThe slippery slope argumentby GA den Hartogh · Cited by 66 — If the appeal to a pernicious precedent is a valid form of argument...
-
Source: ceb.com
Title: How to Leverage Past Decisions in Current Cases
Link: https://ceb.com/blog/legal-precedent-how-to-leverage-past-decisions-in-current-cases/Source snippet
CEBPrecedent serves key functions in the legal system: it ensures stability and predictability, allowing individuals and businesses to an...
-
Source: www2.law.ucla.edu
Title: School of Law The Mechanisms of the Slippery Slope
Link: https://www2.law.ucla.edu/Volokh/slippery.pdfSource snippet
UCLA School of LawThe Mechanisms of the Slippery SlopeNovember 26, 2012 — by E Volokh — recognizes a new exception to [free speech]({{ 'free-speech/' | relative_url }}) protect...
Published: November 26, 2012
-
Source: philpapers.org
Link: https://philpapers.org/archive/JEFSSA.pdfSource snippet
PhilPapersThis is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following...by A Jefferson · 2014 · Cited by 38 — Slippery slopes that occur in j...
-
Source: plato.stanford.edu
Link: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/legal-reas-prec/index.htmlSource snippet
and Analogy in Legal Reasoning20 Jun 2006 — Precedent involves an earlier decision being followed in a later case because both cases are...
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: Slippery Slope
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxylBjtzMNQ -
Source: youtube.com
Title: Ways to avoid precedent by overruling, reversing and distinguishing
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm9utktcMFwSource snippet
Doctrine of Precedent | English Legal System...
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: Doctrine of Precedent | English Legal System
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FP-OZ_3CW6w -
Source: hallellis.co.uk
Link: https://hallellis.co.uk/doctrine-of-precedent-court-cases/ -
Source: uclalawreview.org
Link: https://www.uclalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/24_51UCLALRev5392003-2004.pdfSource snippet
An initial, seemingly acceptable argument and decision;. 2. A "danger case"-a later argument and...Read more...
-
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Slippery slope
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slopeSource snippet
Slippery slopeThe core of the slippery slope argument is that a specific decision under [debate]({{ 'debate/' | relative_url }}) is likely to result in unintended conse...
Additional References
-
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/10qel0m/cmv_when_discussing_laws_court_decisions_and/Source snippet
When discussing laws, court decisions, and other things...CMV: When discussing laws, court decisions, and other things impacted by legal...
-
Source: econfaculty.gmu.edu
Link: https://econfaculty.gmu.edu/pboettke/workshop/spring05/Rizzo.pdfSource snippet
(SSA) is an argument about how the acceptance of one argument (regarding a decision, act, or policy) may lead to the acceptance of...Rea...
-
Source: supremecourt.uk
Title: Default Rules in Common Law Lord Sales 5fbadbd54a
Link: https://supremecourt.uk/uploads/Default_Rules_in_Common_Law_Lord_Sales_5fbadbd54a.pdfSource snippet
Supreme Court UKRules in the Common Law: Substantive Rules and Precedent24 Mar 2023 — The common law is itself, in a sense, a collection...
-
Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Title: Precedent and the Rule of Law
Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8643603/Source snippet
PMCby S Lewis · 2021 · Cited by 105 — In the civil law [tradition]({{ 'tradition/' | relative_url }}), precedents are often used in order to tip the balance in favour of part...
-
Source: scribbr.co.uk
Title: Slippery Slope Fallacy | Definition & Examples
Link: https://www.scribbr.co.uk/fallacy/the-slippery-slope-fallacy/Source snippet
Scribbr17 Apr 2023 — The slippery slope fallacy is an argument that suggests an initial event will inevitably cause another undesirable e...
-
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/greg.koukl/posts/slippery-slope-arguments-link-one-way-of-thinking-to-an-unintended-consequence-t/1434657585122868/Source snippet
events and lead to an extreme or undesirable outcome. The...Read more...
-
Source: marcellodibello.com
Link: https://www.marcellodibello.com/PHI370/resources/SchauerPrecedent.pdfSource snippet
3.1 Precedent in Two DirectionsLike vertical precedent, stare decisis—horizontal precedent—is about following the decisions of oth- ers...
-
Source: legal.thomsonreuters.com
Title: the doctrine of stare decisis
Link: https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/the-doctrine-of-stare-decisis/Source snippet
Thomson Reuters LegalStare decisis: Definition, examples and critical analysis5 Nov 2024 — Stare decisis, meaning in Latin “to stand by t...
-
Source: papers.ssrn.com
Title: SSRN ID1445308 code383968
Link: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1445308_code383968.pdf?abstractid=1445308&mirid=1&type=2Source snippet
slope argumentsA first additional requirement for calling an argument a slippery slope argument can be distilled from this: sequential ev...
-
Source: harvardlawreview.org
Link: https://harvardlawreview.org/?p=16979Source snippet
The Paradox of Precedent About Precedent10 Jan 2025 — When the Supreme Court overrules or declines to overrule a past decision, it typica...
Topic Tree